Crispening — where it appears
Named by 2 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
A dark background moves every difference and no match
CIECAM16's background is one number, and it reaches lightness as one exponent. That is enough to change what a grey looks like and not enough to change which of two greys is lighter — so a match survives the background exactly, a corresponding colour is invariant to it, and a tolerance is not. The effect the background is usually invoked to explain is absent from the model entirely.
The cancellation is exact and cheap to lose
CIECAM16 has no crispening, and adding one was expected to be expensive: the background's exactness in a corresponding colour comes from its being a common exponent, and a function of the sample's own level is not one. It is expensive in kind and not in size. A term that raises a straddling pair's lightness difference by half moves a corresponding colour by five thousandths of a tristimulus unit — a thousandth of what stating the background differently at the two ends already costs.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
CIECAM16Colour appearanceColour differenceCorresponding coloursLightnessModelling assumptionSimultaneous contrastViewing conditionChromatic adaptationInvarianceTolerance