Pigment — where it appears
Named by 39 essays across 7 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
Paint is not a filter
Stacking two filters multiplies their transmittances. Stirring two pigments together does not multiply their reflectances, because a mixture is one scattering layer rather than two in series — light meets whichever particle is nearest. Treating the two as the same operation is a 15-unit error, and which way it errs turns out to depend on whether the comparison holds the amount of pigment fixed.
Why blue and yellow make green
The oldest fact in colour, and the usual explanations are wrong. It is not because green sits between blue and yellow, and it is not a fact about the eye at all — it is that the only band both pigments return is their overlap, and the overlap of a blue and a yellow reflectance is green. Computed, the mixing path bows away from the straight line by a measurable amount.
A colour that moves with the viewer
A thin film has no pigment in it. Its reflectance spectrum is an interference condition containing a path length and an angle, so tilting the sample moves every maximum to a shorter wavelength and changes the colour by 40 units of ΔE. A pigment's spectrum contains neither, and cannot do this at all — which is the cleanest separation between the two kinds of colour there is, and it is geometric rather than chemical.
Most things are pale in the infrared
A spectrophotometer stops at 780 nanometres and a black cotton shirt reflecting five per cent of visible light reflects more than half the near infrared. The measurement everybody has and the quantity a camera integrates are different quantities, and nothing in the first says so.
A brand colour is an ink
A named colour is a jar of pigment with a spectrum, and a four-colour build of it is three inks arranged to integrate to the same three numbers. Of 156 constructed single-pigment inks, 15 can be matched at all — and those fifteen drift by a median of 3.8 colour differences under a tungsten lamp, because the match was never a match.
A notch a pigment cannot cut
The worst change of light a painted room can produce has no maximum inside the box the search was given, which the previous round reported as a family with no worst case. Bounded by what a molecule can actually do, it has one — at a band six nanometres wide, narrower than any pigment and narrower than the box.
The darkest wall anybody sells
Asked which property of a paint decides the worst change of light a room can produce, anybody would answer how saturated it is allowed to be. A ceiling on saturation never comes near binding, because the worst wall is dark rather than colourful — and the constraint that does bind is one nobody would nominate.
A point about the pigments that remain
The chromaticity at which a protanope's confusion lines meet does not move at all when the long-wave pigment moves — not slightly, exactly not at all. It moves a great deal when the medium-wave pigment does. A dichromat's confusion point is a fact about the two receptors they have rather than about the one they lack.
The claim, in nanometres
For four rounds the claim here has been that every published adaptation transform puts the protanope's confusion point outside any real population of eyes, stated in standard deviations of a population whose widths were declared rather than measured. Restated as a pigment displacement it needs no population at all — and the nearest transform asks the medium-wave cone to move thirty per cent of the way to the long-wave one.
Five transforms and the space between them
Every appearance prediction here chooses one of five published adaptation transforms, and the five disagree about where a protanope's confusion lines meet by more than the distance between the two pigments the disagreement is about. That spread is itself a scale, and using it needs no population model at all.
The limits assume a pigment that switches instantly
The hardest boundary in colorimetry is reached by reflectances that jump between nought and one at a wavelength, and no material does that. Constrain the jump to take twenty nanometres — a sharp dye — and the median direction of the object-colour solid loses under half a per cent of its reach. Constrain it to eighty, an ordinary pigment, and the median loses five per cent, the tenth percentile nearly a quarter, and seven directions in ten lose more than one. The cost is in a corner only for chemistry sharper than paint.
Three lines spare a slow pigment
A pigment that cannot switch faster than forty nanometres loses more than a per cent of its reach in 183 of the object-colour solid's 305 directions under daylight. Under an LED whose light sits in three narrow lines, it loses that much in 62. Between the lines almost nothing is measured, so a slow reflectance can do its changing there — until its transitions are as wide as the lines are far apart, at which point the lamp stops helping and the count jumps to daylight's.
A limit written in energy charges the reds
A slope limit on reflectance is usually written in nanometres and applied the same way across the spectrum. An absorption band's width is closer to a fixed spread of photon energy, which is nearly twice as many nanometres at 700 as at 500. Written that way, a limit that is forty nanometres at 550 is kinder to the object-colour solid overall — 489 of 913 directions lose a per cent rather than 544 — and it charges the reds more. Which directions pay is decided by one thing: whether their optimal edges fall above or below the reference wavelength.
A tint in paint turns the other way
A pale colour can be made two ways: by stirring white pigment into a coloured one, or by adding white light to it — which is what a halftone on white paper and a display both do. At the same luminance the two tints are not the same colour. For seven of eight pigments they turn the hue in opposite directions, an orange by +13.5 degrees in paint and −13.9 in light, and the paint tint is the more colourful of the two every time. The cause is in the reflectance: diluting a pigment moves its absorption edge, and adding light does not.
A fourth emitter spends the gap it fills
A three-emitter LED lets a pigment that takes forty nanometres to switch reach most of its ideal solid, because the lamp is dark where the pigment is slow. Adding a fourth emitter to render better takes that darkness back — but only if it is put in the middle of a gap. At 490 nanometres it costs 172 of the solid's 312 directions against the three-emitter lamp's 62, and renders two points worse. At 540 it costs three directions and renders two and a half points better.
The gap has to be dark, not the line narrow
A lamp whose light sits in three narrow emitters lets a blunt pigment reach most of its ideal solid, and the reason was given as the spacing of the lines. Broadening those emitters without moving them says otherwise. At 1.3 times their nominal width the lamp still looks like a line spectrum, its closest spacing has not changed at all, and half the rescue is gone — because the darkest point of the narrow gap has risen from one per cent of the lamp's peak to seven.
A sharp edge is bought with depth
A slope limit on reflectance was introduced as the weakest honest statement of a pigment's bluntness, with a band-shape limit named as the stronger version to be written later. Written, it is not stronger. Three absorption bands none narrower than forty nanometres reach further than a forty-nanometre slope limit in 94 of 154 directions of the object-colour solid, because a band's width and the width of the reflectance edge it draws are different quantities — and what converts one into the other is how much colorant is in the film.
Printing does not change the sign
A tint mixed in paint and a tint mixed in light turn seven of eight pigments' hues opposite ways. A halftone sits between the two because light entering the paper between dots emerges under a dot, and the question was where. At the optical gain a coated sheet is fitted at, a halftone has travelled between 26 and 44 per cent of the way from the light ideal to the paint one — the same fraction for every ink — and only one pigment in eight changes direction.
Newsprint turns a tint with its colour, not its gain
A halftone tint turns its hue the way a mixture of light does, by less, because optical dot gain carries it part of the way towards a paint tint. The straight line through a coated sheet's gain predicted that an uncoated sheet's larger gain would carry the orange past the crossing at a factor of 3.2, so that the same ink would turn opposite ways on two papers. It does turn opposite ways — on newsprint the orange's pale tints swing 13 degrees one way where a coated sheet's swing 8 the other. But the gain is not what does it. The road towards paint bends and stops at 60 to 70 per cent of the way, the orange needs a factor of 5.4 to cross, and newsprint's reversal comes almost entirely from the paper being yellow. Read against the paper's own white, as a reader looking at the page is adapted, it goes away.
A lopsided band does not break the trade
A fourth emitter added to a three-emitter LED renders colours better and costs a slow pigment its reach, and the position that renders best and the position that costs least were thirty-five nanometres apart. The obvious suspect was the shape: every emitter searched was a symmetric bump, and a band with its skirt on one side might fill a gap without splitting it. Freed to be lopsided, it saves between one and seven of the solid's three hundred directions. No band renders like the amber emitter and costs like the green one, the lopsided bands that help lean the other way from the proposal, and what the fourth band renders was never the lamp's white.
The pigment decides the trade, not the band
A four-emitter lamp that renders well costs a slow pigment part of its reach, and reshaping the fourth band barely changes that. Changing the pigment changes it a great deal. Modelled as three absorption bands none narrower than forty nanometres, rather than as a forty-nanometre slope limit, a slow pigment loses a third fewer of the solid's directions under the best-rendering lamp, and the price of going from the three-emitter lamp to a fidelity of 88 halves. The lopsided band that helped a slope-limited pigment does nothing at all for this one. And at 590 nanometres a fourth band renders at 86 almost for free.
Written in energy, the bands spare the green
A slow pigment modelled as absorption bands pays half what a slope limit pays for a four-emitter lamp's rendering, and a fourth band at 590 nanometres costs it almost nothing. That result assumed every band is at least forty nanometres wide, and a real absorption band has a width in energy, not in nanometres. Written that way it is narrower in the blue and wider in the red, and the fear was that the red would take back the amber. It does not. The band limit written in energy loses fewer directions under every lamp, the fourth band at 590 still costs six, and the price of rendering at 88 falls from ten directions to six — because the directions it wins back are green, not amber.
The lamp outweighs the pigment model
Three models of what a real colorant can do — a slope limit, absorption bands forty nanometres wide, and bands whose width is fixed in energy — were ranked under lamps of narrow emitters, slope dearest and energy cheapest. Under daylight, tungsten and a white LED the ranking holds, every time. What changes is everything else: each model loses two and a half to three and a half times as many directions of the object-colour solid under a broadband lamp as under three narrow emitters, and the difference between the models is smaller than the difference between the lamps. Under tungsten, whose power rises smoothly to the red, the three models are nearly one.
A tube spares a pigment through its phosphors
Three models of a real pigment lose two and a half to three and a half times as many directions of the object-colour solid under daylight as under three narrow emitters. A fluorescent tube is both kinds of lamp — narrow mercury lines on phosphor bands — and the prediction was that its bands would light the gaps between its lines and put it two thirds of the way to daylight. A triphosphor tube sits with the emitters instead: 26 directions lost to forty-nanometre bands, against the emitters' 23 and daylight's 73. The credit is its phosphors'. Its coating alone, lines taken out, loses fewer still; its mercury lines cost directions whose edges sit in the gaps between the phosphors, and doubled they cost more. A halophosphate tube, the same lines on two broad bands, costs what daylight costs at the same rendering index.
A mercury lamp's few losses are deep
Every census of what a slow pigment can reach has counted the directions of the object-colour solid it misses by more than one per cent, and by that count a clear mercury lamp — four visible lines and nothing else — spares a pigment as well as three narrow emitters do. Read for depth, it is the one lamp of nine whose losses do not fall away: half of what a slope-limited pigment loses under it, it loses by more than five per cent, and its mean shortfall is half as large again as under the emitters or a triphosphor tube. Every one of those losses is the same kind of colour: one that reflects the mercury's green line at 546 nm and absorbs its yellow line at 578, or the reverse, 32 nm apart. The dark-share rule that ordered the counts orders the depths less well.
A pair of lines asks for a cliff, not a gap
Under a clear mercury lamp, every direction of colour a slow pigment loses by more than five per cent asks it to reflect one of the lamp's green and yellow lines, 32 nanometres apart, and absorb the other. The prediction was that a pigment of two absorption bands with a narrow gap between them — a peak no single transition can make — would recover those deep losses. No direction asks for a peak. The lamp's four lines leave only one transition within a hundred nanometres of another, so what a splitting direction needs is a cliff: one flank falling from reflecting to absorbing in the twenty-five nanometres between the green line's last strong sample and the yellow's first. One band at the census's depth takes 27.8 to fall that far; two stacked at one centre take 24.9. Searched from 680 starts, the census's own band model does exactly that — stacks its bands on one side of the pair — and reaches further than the census found in seventeen directions of twenty-five. What stays deep spends a band on the blue.
A harder search pulls the band pigments away from the slope limit
Every count in the pigment-limit censuses — how many directions of the object-colour solid a slow pigment cannot reach within one per cent of the ideal — compares a slope limit solved exactly with two band models searched from a few structured starts. Under the mercury lamp a search from 680 starts had already found the band model reaching further in seventeen of twenty-five directions. Searched from 594 starts under all nine lamps, both band models reach further in between three fifths and nineteen twentieths of the directions they lost, and their counts fall by a sixth: 395 to 335 for bands in nanometres, 370 to 311 for bands in energy, while the slope limit stays at 463. The rankings the censuses reported hold where they were stated. What moves is everything measured against the slope limit: its lead over the band models grows from a sixth to more than a third, the coating's odd ranking — bands losing more than the slope limit — disappears, the triphosphor tube passes the three emitters for bands in nanometres, and under the mercury lamp the band models' deep losses halve.
The slope limit was exact all along
Every count of what a slow pigment cannot reach compares a slope limit, solved exactly on 161 levels of reflectance, with two band models found by searching. Searched harder, the band models lost a sixth of their losses, and the open question was whether the slope limit was being flattered by its own grid — whether 321 or 641 levels would lower its counts too. The prediction was a fall of under a twentieth. There is no fall at all: on every finer grid, under all nine lamps, every direction reaches exactly what it reached, and 463 directions are lost as before. The reason is the shape of the answer. The best reflectance that may change by at most an eighth per five-nanometre band is a staircase whose every step is a whole eighth, because a weighted sum is maximised at a corner of the allowed set and every corner is built from full steps off nought or one. A grid of only the nine eighths gives every answer to the last digit. The census's count is therefore not an estimate on a grid but an exact statement about every pigment that slow, and the slope limit's 1.38-fold lead over the searched band model is a floor that further search can only raise.
A slow pigment splits mercury's lines only if its swing fits between them
Under a clear mercury lamp a pigment whose reflectance may swing from nought to one over no less than forty nanometres loses 21 of the census's 148 directions, and every one of them asks it to reflect one of the lamp's green and yellow lines and absorb the other. The census samples the spectrum every five nanometres, which smears each six-nanometre line across a band, and the prediction was that a one-nanometre grid would let the pigment's cliff fall between the lines and cut the count by a third. It cuts it by nothing: 21 on either grid. Narrowing the lines to one and a half nanometres cuts it only to 17. What decides the losses is the lines' spacing, 31.5 nanometres, against the pigment's swing. With narrow lines a pigment whose swing is 30 nanometres loses no direction at all, and one whose swing is 34 loses fourteen; the step sits at the gap. The mercury lamp's cost to a slow pigment belongs to the lamp, not to how the census samples it.
A band pigment must be narrower than the gap it splits
Under a clear mercury lamp a pigment built from absorption bands no narrower than forty nanometres falls short in fifteen of the twenty-five directions that ask it to reflect the green line and absorb the yellow, or the reverse — the count an earlier search left short however deep it cut its cliff. The slope-limited pigment's losses turned out to be the lines' 31.5 nm spacing against its swing, and the prediction was that the band pigment's are the same arithmetic, falling to nought near a band thirty nanometres wide. Searched on a one-nanometre grid with the lines narrowed, the count falls at every narrower band — fifteen at forty, eleven at thirty-five, nine at thirty — and reaches nought at twenty-five, not thirty. Every loss already splits the pair and falls short on both lines at once: a Gaussian band deep enough to absorb one line keeps absorbing a little of the other. One band of depth twelve, placed as well as it can be, errs by 3.2 per cent at forty nanometres, 0.8 at thirty and 0.2 at twenty-five; doubling its depth buys less than narrowing it by five nanometres.
A steep side splits mercury's lines at forty nanometres
Under a clear mercury lamp a pigment built from Gaussian absorption bands no narrower than forty nanometres falls short in fifteen of the twenty-five directions that ask it to reflect the green line and absorb the yellow, or the reverse, because a band's tail reaches the line it should pass. Real dye bands are often lopsided, and the prediction was that a band whose one side is half the other's, the steep side free to face either way, loses at forty nanometres about as many directions as a symmetric band thirty wide — nine — and helps only the directions that pass the green. It loses one. At thirty-five and thirty it loses none. In every one of the twenty-five fits the absorbing band turns its steep side to the line it must pass, and both kinds of direction gain: none of fourteen passing the green is lost, one of eleven passing the yellow. A single band forty nanometres wide with a steep side splits the two lines within 0.37 per cent; a symmetric band must narrow to about twenty-seven to do as well.
A band must be nearly two to one before its steep side pays
Under a clear mercury lamp, a pigment of absorption bands forty nanometres wide loses fifteen or sixteen of the twenty-five directions that ask it to reflect the green line and absorb the yellow, or the reverse, and the same bands with one side a third of the width and the other two thirds lose one. The prediction for milder skews was that the losses fall in step with a single band's error — to about eight at sides of 0.55 and 0.45, three at 0.6 and 0.4 — so that a three-to-two skew already halves them. It does not. The census loses thirteen at 0.55, ten at 0.6, five at 0.65 and one at two to one: three directions recovered per twentieth of skew at first, twelve at the last. The losses track one band's error against the one-per-cent line the census counts by, and a single band crosses that line only near a skew of 0.62. A dye's modest natural asymmetry buys a few directions; the steep side pays only when it is close to half the other.
A band is only as wide as its steep side
Under a clear mercury lamp, a pigment of absorption bands forty nanometres wide must be skewed nearly two to one before it can split the green line from the yellow, and the prediction for bands five nanometres narrower was that a single band crosses one per cent of error near a skew of 0.57 and the census's losses fall to five or fewer by 0.6. The losses do fall to four by 0.6; the single band crosses one per cent at 0.555. But the forty-nanometre rule that read the losses off that one-per-cent line breaks at once, and what replaces it is simpler: a thirty-five-nanometre band at 0.6 and a forty-nanometre band at 0.65 have the same steep side, fourteen nanometres, and lose the same four directions by the same shortfalls to a hundredth of a point. Three widths and fourteen pigments fall on one staircase in the steep side alone. Searching every loss again from the milder skews' answers finds one direction the census missed, at both widths, and corrects the forty-nanometre counts to nine and four.
At one half-width a flank can lose nothing or nearly everything
Under a clear mercury lamp, a pigment of Gaussian absorption bands splits the green line from the yellow according to its steep side's half-width alone, and a Gaussian flank is fixed by its half-width — so the census could not say whether it measures the half-width or the absorbance left in the flank's foot at the line it should spare. The prediction was that the foot decides: at a half-width of fourteen nanometres, a Lorentzian steep side loses most of the twenty-five splitting directions and a sharper-footed one none. It does. A power-four Gaussian loses none, the Gaussian four, a squared hyperbolic secant nineteen and a Lorentzian twenty-two, in the order of their single bands' errors. But a single band's error is not the whole account: three profiles drawn at the half-widths that give a single band the same error — 7.73, fourteen and 39.1 nanometres — lose two, four and seven directions, and the widest of them loses directions the others keep, because its shoulder starts absorbing nearer the green.
A hundredth of Lorentzian undoes a Gaussian flank
Under a clear mercury lamp, a band pigment whose steep side is a Gaussian fourteen nanometres wide at half depth loses four of the twenty-five directions that split the green line from the yellow, and the same side drawn as a Lorentzian loses twenty-two. A real absorption band is usually a Voigt profile, a Gaussian core with a Lorentzian share in its wings, and the prediction was that a twentieth of Lorentzian doubles the Gaussian's losses and a fifth reaches nineteen. The direction is right and the scale is not. A hundredth of Lorentzian takes the pigment from four lost directions to eleven; a fiftieth to fourteen; a twentieth to eighteen; a fifth to twenty. The best-placed band leaves the passed line more than three half-widths from its centre, out in the wing, and there a wing one per cent Lorentzian carries twice the absorbance of the whole Gaussian. The count saturates near twenty while the worst direction's shortfall keeps growing, from 2.8 per cent at a hundredth to 51 with a full Lorentzian.
A narrower flank moves its wing in with it
Under a clear mercury lamp, a band pigment whose steep side is a Gaussian fourteen nanometres wide loses four of the twenty-five directions that split the green line from the yellow, and with a twentieth of Lorentzian in that side it loses eighteen, because the wing three half-widths out out-absorbs the whole Gaussian there. A Lorentzian wing falls as the square of the distance over its half-width, and the prediction was that narrowing the side to seven nanometres brings the twentieth-Lorentzian pigment back to four losses and to five nanometres to none. It loses thirteen at ten nanometres, twelve at seven and seven at five, while the Gaussian loses nothing at all three. The wing still decides: the narrower band does not stay where the wider one sat but moves fourteen nanometres in towards the line it must pass, so its wing there falls fourfold rather than eightfold.
A five-nanometre flank carries a fiftieth of Lorentzian
A band pigment splitting mercury's green and yellow lines with a steep side five nanometres wide loses none of the twenty-five splitting directions as a Gaussian and seven with a twentieth of Lorentzian in its flank, because the band slides in towards the passed line and carries its wing there. The prediction was that at five nanometres the count follows the single band's error, which grows in proportion to the share: about two lost at a fiftieth and none at a hundredth. A hundredth loses none, as predicted. The first search lost one direction at a fiftieth — and searched again from the best pigments found at the neighbouring shares, that direction reaches within two thousandths of the ideal: a fiftieth loses none either. The same second search recovers two of the twentieth's seven, leaving five. A sharp enough flank tolerates a fiftieth of Lorentzian where a fourteen-nanometre one lost fourteen directions to it.
Each direction falls short by one band's ratio
A band pigment asked to reflect mercury's green line and absorb its yellow, with a twentieth of Lorentzian in its steep side, loses eighteen of twenty-five splitting directions at a steep side fourteen nanometres wide, thirteen at ten, twelve at seven and five at five. A second search had lowered the five-nanometre count, and the prediction was that searching the seven- and ten-nanometre pigments again lowers each by one or two, leaving a count nearly linear in the half-width. Searched again, both lose exactly what they lost — no direction gains six tenths of a point. The uneven fall is real, and the reason is plainer than any search: every direction's shortfall falls with the half-width by the same factor as a single band's error, so the count is a fixed ranking of constants, one a direction, read against a line that moves.
The ranking reads six nanometres to the direction
Every direction a band pigment loses under mercury's lines falls short, as its steep side narrows, by the same factor as a single band's error — so each direction carries a constant, and the count at any half-width can be read off one band with no search at all. Read that way, a twentieth of Lorentzian loses nine directions at a six-nanometre steep side, three at four and a half and none at four. Searched, six nanometres loses nine: the same nine, every direction within 6.2 per cent of where the constants put it. Four loses none. Four and a half loses one, not three — the two the ranking added sit 0.005 and 0.011 of a point under the one-per-cent line. And at the narrowest widths the gentle directions begin to fall short by more than the ranking says, by up to 29 per cent, which is where the single band stops being the whole story.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Optimal coloursObject-colour solidAbsorptionSpectral power distributionOptimisationModelling assumptionReflectanceWavelength gridNarrow band displaysBoundChromatic adaptationColour rendering