The Hunt effect — where it appears
Named by 3 essays across 3 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
Brighter looks more colourful
Colourfulness rises with light level and the model predicts it. Apparent contrast is supposed to rise too, and the model does not — which turns out to be right, because the thing that actually carries contrast is the surround.
A corner moves both terms
The interreflection essays compute what a corner does to a spectrum, which is one of the two things a corner does. It is also a brighter place with a differently coloured background — a viewing condition, not a stimulus — and adaptation removes most of the first and none of the second. At an enclosure of six tenths that is 63 per cent of seven units gone and a further unit arriving from the extra light alone.
An appearance model sees the per-channel sky turn twice as far
BT.2390's tone curve, applied to each channel of a 1,000 cd/m² master shown on a 100 cd/m² display, raises a sky-blue's green share from a tenth to 69 per cent of its blue and turns its ICtCp hue 23°, where the same curve applied to the largest channel with all three scaled keeps the hue within 3°. ICtCp's hue is not an appearance, and the prediction was that CIECAM16, read under the display's own white, still shows the per-channel turn as more than twenty hue-quadrature units and more than ten ΔEITP, the scaled curve under three of each. The appearance model sees it as fifty-two units, more than half the way from unique blue to unique green, and its lightness more than doubles. The scaled curve keeps hue and lightness to a quarter of a unit. And ΔEITP between master and display ranks the two curves backwards: in absolute light the per-channel sky is the nearer one.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
ColourfulnessAbsolute luminanceAdaptationApparent contrastChromatic adaptationCIECAM16Colour appearanceColour appearance modelColour bleedingColour constancyΔEITPForm factor