Projection — where it appears
Named by 5 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
Three numbers
A spectrum has as many degrees of freedom as anyone cares to give it. The eye reports three. Everything colour science can do, and every way it fails, follows from that one collapse.
A camera is a fourth observer
The 1931 functions, the 1964 functions and a person's own cones are three sets of three curves that collapse a spectrum onto three numbers. A camera is a fourth, built from silicon and dye rather than from pigment and neural wiring, and it agrees with none of them.
Luther said when it would work
There is an exact condition under which a fixed three-by-three matrix converts camera raw to XYZ correctly for every spectrum in existence. It was stated in 1927, it is a theorem rather than a guideline, and no camera ever built satisfies it.
The camera has its own metamers
Two surfaces a camera records as identical can be plainly different to a person, and two a person cannot tell apart can be recorded as different. Both pairs are constructed rather than found, from one projection, used for both.
Three curves for one space
Rotate a set of colour-matching functions by an arbitrary invertible matrix, undo the rotation at the end, and the computed colour is identical to eight parts in a thousand million million. An observer is a three-dimensional subspace, not a set of curves, and the literature keeps reopening a question that is a theorem.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Standard observerNull spaceCamera rawCone fundamentalsMetamerismSpectral sensitivityColour-matching functionsLuther conditionMetameric blackTrichromacyXYZAssertion