The collection

Every essay — page 54

Page 54 of 54, continuing through the fields in the same order.

What light is What the eye does Matching and measuring Difference and uniformity What the brain does What a scene does What a camera does Where the model breaks What it takes to deliver it

SeriesObserversNamed objectsRefutationsSearch

What it takes to deliver it

A colour that stays where it was measured is nobody's problem. This is the apparatus that carries one to somebody else — ink on a sheet, a profile, a rendering intent, a proof, and a room — and every stage of it is a map that loses something, chosen deliberately.

Doubling the nodes quarters the chroma a table loses. For a deep-blue and a brown ray of dark colours printed with four inks, the mean chroma the table loses between its nodes below where a total-ink cap binds, over every light-black strategy and cap that binds: uncapped, capped hard and through a fifteen-unit knee, on tables of 9, 17, 33 and 65 nodes. Capped hard, the blue loses 0.617, 0.174, 0.0429 and 0.0097: each doubling from seventeen nodes takes about three quarters of it away, the square of the spacing, on both rays and with or without the cap.

More nodes quarter the dulling and leave the knee a larger share

A four-ink table printing a dark saturated colour between its nodes prints it a little duller than asked, and a knee in the ink limit, which quiets the hue error, deepens that dulling by about a hundredth of a unit. The prediction was that doubling the table's nodes quarters the dulling — the square of the spacing — and the knee's added cost with it, so that on a dense table the knee's hue gain is all that remains. On tables of 9, 17, 33 and 65 nodes along a deep-blue and a brown ray, the dulling does fall about fourfold with each doubling, capped or not, to under a hundredth at 65 nodes. The knee's added dulling does not keep pace: on the blue it is 13 per cent of the hard cap's at seventeen nodes, 23 at 33 and 35 at 65, and the knee's whole error, an eighth more than the hard cap's at seventeen nodes, is a quarter more at 65. The knee keeps its hue gain at every density. A denser table shrinks every error and makes the knee's trade worse.

6 figures
The hard cap has a corner; the knee has a bend. For the same strategy, the separation's total ink against lightness around where the cap binds: met hard, it rises to 220 per cent and stops in a corner; through the knee it rounds off over several units. The dots mark the 65-node table's nodes and the three placed ones. A straight line between nodes misses a corner by one segment's scallop and a bend by several, which is why placed nodes help the hard cap more than the knee.

Three nodes at the cap's corner cut the dulling by a third

A four-ink table printing a dark saturated colour between its nodes prints it duller than asked, and at 65 nodes a fifteen-unit knee in the ink limit carries 35 per cent of that dulling on a deep-blue ray. The prediction was that the knee's added dulling sits in the two or three segments just below where the cap binds, and that three nodes placed there take its share back under a tenth. The first half holds: the knee's addition peaks one unit of lightness below the binding point and four fifths of it lies within seven. The second does not. Three nodes placed one, two and three units below the bind cut the hard cap's dulling by a third, 0.0097 to 0.0064, and the knee's by nearly two fifths, where three more evenly spaced nodes cut each by under a tenth — but the knee keeps a quarter of the dulling. The hard cap has a corner, which one node can catch; the knee has a bend spread over a dozen units, which three nodes split but do not straighten. A node at the binding point alone helps only the hard cap, and leaves the knee 41 per cent.

6 figures
Shared nodes fail the colours that bind below them and beat their own for the rest. For every strategy and cap on both rays, how much of the hard-cap gain its own three placed nodes buy the shared placement keeps — three nodes one, two and three units below the median binding point, L* 19.4 to 17.4 — against how far above those nodes the case's cap binds. Cases binding below them keep almost none; cases binding more than two units above keep more than all, up to 395 per cent.

Shared nodes belong in the deep shadow

Three nodes placed just below where each dark colour's ink reaches the press's cap cut a four-ink table's dulling of that colour by a third — but a profile's nodes along lightness are shared by every colour, and the colours' caps bind anywhere from L* 15 to 31. The prediction was that one shared placement keeps two thirds of the own-placement gain on a deep-blue ray and all of it on a brown. Placed once, one to three units below the median binding point, the nodes keep 63 per cent of the blue's hard-cap gain and 92 of the brown's — and the averages hide a split. Every colour whose cap binds more than two and a half units below the shared nodes keeps under a twentieth of its own gain; every colour whose cap binds more than two units above them keeps more than all of it, up to four times. For those colours most of the dulling was never at the cap's corner: it lies in the deep shadow, where black keeps climbing under the cap, and the shared nodes sit there. Spreading the three nodes across the binding points buys nothing three even nodes would not.

6 figures
Easing the cap below L* 20 halves the dulling and more. For every strategy and cap on the deep-blue and brown rays, hard and through the fifteen-unit knee, the mean chroma a 65-node four-ink table loses below the cap with the cap held and eased by a tenth and a fifth on a straight ramp from L* 20 to the floor. Eased by a fifth the blue's hard-cap dulling falls from 9.71 to 4.89 thousandths and the brown's from 9.70 to 1.30.

Easing the cap reaches the deep shadow and no higher

A four-ink table prints dark saturated colours duller than asked between its nodes, and for colours whose ink reaches the press's total-ink cap high up the dulling lies mostly in the deep shadow below L* 20, where black climbs under a held total. The proposal was to let the total fall below the cap there, and the prediction was that easing the cap by a tenth or a fifth between L* 20 and the floor halves those colours' dulling on even nodes — more than three shared nodes do — at a cost of a unit or two of L* in the darkest colour the press can reach. There is no cost: every eased table still prints the floor at L* 14. Eased by a fifth, the deep-blue ray's dulling halves and the brown's falls to an eighth. But the eight colours that bind above L* 26 keep three fifths of theirs: the ease removes two thirds of their deep-shadow dulling and none of what lies between their binding point and L* 20. And the eased cap does not let black rise less steeply — it makes black rise faster.

6 figures
For the high binders a higher ramp trades one stretch for the other. For the eight cases binding above L 26, the mean hard-cap dulling below L 20, between the binding point and L 20, and over both, against where the ramp starts. From L 26 the upper stretch falls from 6.18 to 2.31 thousandths and the deep shadow rises from 3.85 to 9.33: the total stays at 5.20.

A higher ramp trades one shadow for another

Easing a four-ink table's total-ink cap by a fifth on a ramp from L* 20 to the floor halves the dulling of dark colours whose cap binds low, and leaves the colours that bind high with three fifths of theirs, because most of what is left lies between their binding point and L* 20, above the ramp. The prediction was that a ramp starting at L* 32 halves the high binders' dulling, at a small cost to the low binders. It does neither. Started at L* 26, the same fifth's ease does cut the high binders' upper dulling by more than half — the cap was its cause after all — but their deep-shadow dulling comes back to more than twice what the L* 20 ramp left, and their total is unchanged at 0.0052. The low binders give back nearly everything: on the brown ray from almost nothing to 0.0084 with the ramp at L* 32. Every ray, knee and group does best, or within a fiftieth of best, with the ramp at L* 20.

6 figures
A sixth gained above L* 20, most of the cure lost below it. For the eight cases binding above L 26, the dulling below L 20 and between the binding point and L* 20, with the cap held, eased straight and eased on the bent ramp. The bent ramp cuts the upper stretch from 6.18 to 5.20 thousandths and raises the deep shadow from 3.85 to 7.16.

A bent ramp takes more ink and dulls more

Easing a four-ink table's total-ink cap by a fifth on a straight ramp from L* 20 to the floor straightens the deep shadow's bend and halves the dulling of dark colours, and a ramp started higher trades the deep shadow's cure for the upper stretch's. The prediction for a ramp bent at L* 20 — a quarter of the ease spent between L* 32 and 20, the rest below — was that it keeps nearly all of the deep shadow's cure while taking a third off the high-binding colours' upper stretch, their total falling by a fifth. The bent ramp takes at least as much ink as the straight one at every lightness. It dulls every group more. The high binders' upper stretch improves by a sixth; their deep shadow loses half its cure, and their total rises from 0.0052 to 0.0060; the brown's low binders, left with almost nothing by the straight ramp, keep 0.0039. The deep shadow's cure follows how steeply the cap falls below L* 20 — a fifth of the cap over six units, not three twentieths — and not how much ink is taken there.

6 figures
Read by size, the steepest ramp triples the brown's error. The same cases read by the mean size of the chroma error, overshoot and shortfall alike. On the ramp from L 17 the brown's low binders err by 15.72 thousandths against 5.04 from L 20; the blue's error is 5.19 against 5.21.

A steeper ramp cures the shadow by overshooting it

A four-ink press's total-ink cap dulls the deepest colours it binds, and easing the cap by a fifth on a straight ramp from L* 20 to the floor halves the deep blue's dulling. A ramp bent to take more ink above L* 20 dulled every group more, so the cure seemed to follow how steeply the cap falls below L* 20. The prediction was that a ramp steeper still — the whole fifth spent from L* 17 — cures more. Read as the census has read every ramp, by the mean chroma lost, it does: every group dulls less at each step from L* 20 to 18.5 to 17. But the brown's low binders cross nought: their prints come out more chromatic than the colour asked, by as much as 0.07, and read by the error's size the brown ray's mean error more than doubles. The measure that ranked every earlier ramp was signed, and a signed measure cannot see an overshoot. Eased by a tenth, the steep ramp is no worse anywhere and better on three cases of four.

6 figures
The overshoot follows how fast the cap gives ink back. For each ramp and ease, the brown ray's deepest overshoot — the most its print exceeds the chroma asked — against the rate at which the eased cap returns ink below the ramp's start. A tenth from L 17 and a fifth from L 20 return ink at the same 7.3 points a unit and overshoot by 0.013 and 0.019; a fifth from 17, at twice the rate, by 0.070.

Each dark ray wants its own ease

Easing a four-ink press's total-ink cap below L* 20 cures the dulling of the deepest colours it binds, and a steeper ramp — the whole ease spent from L* 17 — cures more on the signed mean, but eased by a fifth it prints the brown ray's low binders up to 0.07 more chromatic than asked and more than doubles the brown's error read by size. The prediction was that three twentieths from L* 17 is the ease the steep ramp wants: below every earlier setting on both rays. The brown still overshoots, by 0.039, and errs nearly twice as much as on the gentle ramp. The overshoot follows one number — how fast the eased cap gives ink back per unit of lightness — and the two rays want that number set differently. Hard, the blue errs least on three twentieths from L* 17 and the brown on three twentieths from L* 20; the brown's best costs the blue a fifteenth more error, the blue's best costs the brown four fifths more.

6 figures