Dimensionality — where it appears
Named by 3 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
A theorem about a family
A change of light acts on the test surfaces used here as an exact 3×3 matrix with no residual whatsoever, and the whole adaptation argument is built on that being exact. It is exact because the surfaces span exactly three dimensions, and they span exactly three dimensions because three basis functions were written down.
A fourth dimension has a shape
How much a fourth reflectance dimension costs spans a factor of nine across four equally plausible shapes at one amplitude, and the expensive ones are not the shapes a variance figure would identify. The band that hurts is set by the illuminant rather than by the eye, which is why a triphosphor tube and a tungsten lamp disagree about it.
The row a fourth dimension improves
Giving the test surfaces one more degree of freedom makes almost every change of light harder for an adapted observer — but not all of them, and which one it helps depends entirely on what the extra dimension looks like. A triphosphor tube is improved by one shape and hurt more than anything else in the census by another.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
BasisChromatic adaptationMetamerismReflectanceTest setIlluminantPrincipal componentsResidualSpectral resolutionAliasingCone fundamentalsLinearity