Illumination uniformity — where it appears
Named by 3 essays across 3 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
Either factor being zero
Four different departures from the colour integral turn out to have one algebraic form — each is an inner product of something the sample does that the model has no slot for with something the light does that the model assumed away. Either factor being zero makes the departure exactly zero, and the sizes of the two factors decide neither how large it is nor which way it goes.
A room is not a sphere
An integrating sphere reads a surface's own reflectance exactly, and the exactness is a theorem rather than good engineering — under a hemisphere of constant radiance, reciprocity makes the reading the sample's directional-hemispherical reflectance whatever the surface is. Every room fails that condition, and a viewing booth and a window get the sign of the error wrong in opposite directions.
A pixel has an aperture too
A camera photographing a translucent object has the same two discs a spectrophotometer has — one lit, one looked at — and gets them the other way round. Its illumination covers the whole scene, so the flat colour of a translucent surface comes out exactly right at any magnification, and the error moves entirely into the edges.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
ApertureBidirectional reflectanceMarginalisationSubsurface scatteringBilinearityCamera sensorThe Donaldson matrixEdge lossFalsificationGlossLambertianMeasuring geometry