One surface dimmed sixteen times, and the two things that happen to it
Drawn at its defaults, in what a deviation costs, and where. It takes 19 options, and the essays below show what each placement asks of it.
Called by 45 essays
the blast radius of changing it
A deviation is not a difference
The previous round priced twenty departures in colour differences and treated each number as a property of the thing that departed. Every one of them is a product of two factors — how far the reading moved, which is linear and belongs to the departure, and what a unit of that movement is worth where it landed, which is not linear and belongs to the colour. Dimming one surface sixteen times scales the first by exactly sixteen and the second by eight.
Matching and measuringA size is not a direction
An audit that reports magnitudes cannot say what two of them cost together. Over two and a half thousand pairs of observer departures the angle between them in the local metric runs from one degree to a hundred and seventy-nine, and on forty-three per cent of them the two together cost less than the larger of the two alone. Adding the angle predicts the composition to one and a quarter per cent; Pythagoras is out by twenty-eight.
Matching and measuringThe straight piece under the cube root
CIELAB's lightness is described everywhere as a cube root and below a stated luminance it is a straight line, spliced on with two constants chosen so the join is exact in value and in slope. Every black a delivery chain reaches is inside that straight piece — a press black at L* 2.4, a projected black at 1.1 — where the compression does not compress, the price of a deviation is flat to two parts in a thousand, and the second derivative the composition of two departures needs does not exist.
Matching and measuringWhat one number accepts
A delivery tolerance is written as a single colour difference and it acts on three tristimulus values, so what it actually accepts is a closed surface. Measured over sixty-four colours in the sRGB cube, the volume inside that surface varies by a factor of a hundred thousand and its longest axis is between three and thirty times its shortest. The same contract, applied to a dark colour and a light one, is two different requirements.
Matching and measuringA lattice has no derivative
Every departure priced here was priced by perturbing something and reading the answer, which requires the thing being perturbed to have a derivative. A file written on a code lattice does not have one — its output is flat almost everywhere and jumps on a set of measure zero — so quantisation can be bounded and never propagated. The bound is 1.15 colour differences at eight bits per channel against a mean of 0.19, and it is worst where the encoding spends fewest codes.
Matching and measuringThe mixture line bows
Grassmann's second law says an additive mixture is exactly linear in tristimulus values, and tested here it is exact to floating point. Nothing downstream of the three numbers preserves it. The physical half-and-half mixture of two colours sits a median of 5.5 colour differences from the midpoint of their two readings and up to thirty; on a green and a blue display primary it is twenty-one, which is a quarter of the distance between them.
Matching and measuringA tolerance has a grain
A colour tolerance pulled back into tristimulus values is a long thin shape, and across the whole sRGB cube its shortest axis points the same way, fifteen degrees off at the median — the direction in which X rises as Y falls, which is the direction of a*. So what one colour difference allows depends on which way a delivery drifts. An instrument's X filter may age 1.4 per cent before the tolerance is used up, its Z filter 5.1, and the light on the sample 9.3.
Matching and measuringThe appearance model has no straight piece
CIELAB's lightness is a straight line below L* 8, so a deviation near black has a fixed price and a black has a floor under it. CIECAM16 has no such piece. Its lightness near zero goes as the luminance to a power set by the room, the price of a deviation rises without limit as the black deepens — as Y to the power −0.44 in a lit room and −0.58 in a dark one — and on a projected black a lightness unit in the model allows under half the luminance change a unit of L* allows.
Matching and measuringWhich mixture bows most depends on the ruler
The physical half-and-half mixture of two lights misses the midpoint of their two readings in any unit a person is shown, and the share it misses by is about the same in ΔE₀₀ and in the appearance model's own space — 12.8 and 14.6 per cent at the median. Which mixtures miss most is not. The rank correlation between the two units is 0.57, a display's blue and yellow is the worst pair in one and the mildest in the other, and the smaller number usually quoted for the appearance model is its power correction rather than a straighter line.
Difference and uniformityA distance raised to a power has no length
CAM16-UCS's colour difference is its Euclidean distance raised to the power 0.63 and multiplied by 1.41. That is still a metric — the triangle inequality holds on every one of four thousand random triples — and it has no length. A grey ramp from black to white measures 25 units in one step, 137 in a hundred and 755 in ten thousand, growing as the number of steps to the power 0.37, and halving the size of a step triples the number of steps that fit.
Difference and uniformityTwo yellow filters cancel on a slope
An older lens and a denser macular pigment both take blue out of the light, and read before adaptation they move a colour in nearly the same direction, eight degrees apart. Once each eye has adapted to its own white they point a median 156 degrees apart on smooth reflectances and together cost less than the lens alone. On surfaces with a narrow absorption band they still sit 26 degrees apart and add. What decides it is the width of the surface's own features.
What it takes to deliver itA chain measured in a unit that cannot add
A delivery chain's four stages, measured in the power-corrected appearance difference, sum to 7.66 while the chain end to end measures 5.05, and the shortfall was read as the stages partly cancelling. A chain whose four stages lay in a straight line and added exactly would still read 0.74 of its sum in that unit, because a distance raised to the power 0.63 cannot add. Measured in the model's own Euclidean space the same chain reaches 0.84 of its sum. Three quarters of the published shortfall was the exponent.
Matching and measuringA press is charged for the direction it barely moves
A press run varies almost entirely along the direction a colour tolerance forgives. Split along the tolerance's own axes under four stated mixes of press variation, its tightest axis holds about one per cent of the sheet-to-sheet variation and pays a quarter to a third of the price — and on a blue overprint four fifths, for the balance between two inking units rather than the level of either.
Difference and uniformityTwo filters cancel only in a bright enough room
An older lens and a denser macular pigment cancel each other once an eye has adapted — and that result belongs to the end of a dial nobody stands at. Read at the degree of adaptation CIECAM16 gives an ordinary room, the two barely cancel; in a living room they add, and in a cinema they cost six times what they cost under the sky. The room has to be about as bright as an office before the cancelling begins at all.
Difference and uniformityA tolerance has no light level
Twenty-three pairs built at exactly one colour difference stay at exactly one in every room, because the formula has no argument for the room. Read in the unit that does have one, the same pairs are 0.72 in a cinema, 1.04 in an office and 1.30 in direct sun — and inside any one room they spread by half again, so no single conversion between the two units exists at all.
Matching and measuringThe straight line is not the shortest gradient
A colour difference formula says what a small step costs at every colour, and that is enough to ask which path between two colours is shortest. It is not the straight line: between red and green the shortest path bows thirteen CIELAB units away, saves four per cent — and stays inside sRGB on every step where the straight line leaves it. The formula's own answer for the two endpoints, meanwhile, is neither length.
Difference and uniformityAdaptation turns more pairs off than on
One pair of observer departures was followed across the degree of adaptation and found to cancel only in a bright enough room. The same calculation takes any two, and run over all fifteen pairs it says something the single pair does not: adaptation is a rotation rather than a mechanism for making departures oppose each other. Five pairs lose their cancellation as the eye adapts, three gain it, three keep it and four never have it — and the pair everybody quotes is one of the three it turns on.
Difference and uniformityQuadrature is exact in one room
An observer allowance is built by adding the departures in quadrature, which assumes they are mutually perpendicular. Over fifteen pairs their angles run from 18 degrees to 179 and hardly any are perpendicular. Measured against the real combination, quadrature is too small in a cinema by eight per cent and too large under the sky by fourteen, crossing at an adapting luminance of 22 candelas a square metre — and on individual surfaces it is out by a third in both directions in every room.
Difference and uniformityThe room a surface needs is written in its band
Whether two yellow filters cancel on a surface depends on the room, and each surface has its own crossing — the degree of adaptation at which the shared yellowing falls to the size of what is left underneath. Those crossings run from 0.68 to 0.99, and where a surface's absorption band sits accounts for almost all of the spread while how much light it returns accounts for almost none. The reds need a room brighter than a graphic-arts viewing booth, which is brighter than any room a sample is judged in.
Matching and measuringTwo uniform spaces disagree about between
ΔE₀₀'s own local behaviour says which colours lie between two colours, and so does CAM16-UCS's. They do not agree. On cyan to magenta the two shortest paths run fifteen CIELAB units apart — more than either runs from the straight line — and on that gradient ΔE₀₀ would rather have the straight line than CAM16-UCS's answer. Getting the comparison at all takes noticing that one of the two has no local metric: its published difference is a Euclidean distance raised to the power 0.63, and a power below one has an infinite derivative at zero.
Matching and measuringA gamut charges a gradient nothing
On red to green the shortest path happened to stay inside sRGB where the straight line did not, and that was called a coincidence of mechanism. Made into a measurement it is not a coincidence: constraining a path to stay inside the gamut costs less of the metric's own length than the relaxation's own noise, on every gradient tested — including the ones whose free shortest path is outside at fifteen of its twenty-one steps. The gamut's boundary and the metric's cheap region point the same way, and the price of the constraint is nothing.
Matching and measuringA third space breaks the tie only once
ΔE₀₀ and CAM16-UCS disagree about which colours lie between two colours. Oklab was the obvious tie-breaker, and it breaks the tie on one gradient of five: on red to blue its path runs within six CIELAB units of CAM16-UCS's and twenty-nine from ΔE₀₀'s. On red to green and cyan to magenta it keeps to CIELAB's straight line while both others bow, and on blue to yellow it bows further than either. Each of the three spaces is the odd one out somewhere. Asking also exposed a CAM16-UCS path that had never converged.
Matching and measuringA press makes the cheap route a search
Holding a gradient inside a display's gamut cost nothing measurable, and the essay that found it credited the gamut's convexity. A press's gamut is not convex: 216 of 630 straight lines between colours on its own hue ring leave it. Holding gradients inside the press still costs little at best, a median of a tenth of a per cent. But the best route depends on where the relaxation starts, the free path is the best start on one gradient of ten, and on half of them some start is trapped at more than twice the free length. On the display no start is trapped.
Matching and measuringA projection has no reason to detour
Holding a gradient inside a press by penalising the excursion turned the gamut's price from a number into a search: on five of ten crossing gradients some starting point leaves the relaxation trapped at more than twice the free length, and the spread across six starts runs to 271 per cent of the free path. Replacing the penalty with a projection — take the free step, then move each point to the nearest printable colour — leaves no trap on any gradient and a spread of 0.06 to 2.4 per cent.
Matching and measuringA margin costs a press its corners
A gradient held inside a coated press by projection was predicted to tear if the press were first shrunk by a safety margin, at any pinch narrow enough for the shrinking to cut. The press has no such pinch: shrunk by any margin up to thirty CIELAB units it stays in one piece, and projected routes on it are neither trapped nor torn. What a margin costs is concentrated at the corners — the solid yellow moves nearly four times the margin to get inside, like the tip of a 31-degree spike.
Matching and measuringA tolerance's own unit rounds the corners
Shrinking a coated press by a margin in CIELAB units made its corners pay several times the margin — the solid yellow nearly four. A print buyer states a margin in ΔE₀₀, and in that unit the corners pay about half as much: six of nine saturated end colours move within a third of the margin, and only the solid yellow is still sharper than a cube's corner. The prediction that the dark corners would stay sharp was wrong; they round too. What the tolerance's unit costs instead is volume — two ΔE₀₀ keep two thirds of the press where two CIELAB units kept four fifths.
Matching and measuringThe yellow stays sharp because it leans
A safety margin stated in ΔE₀₀ rounds almost every corner of a coated press, and leaves the solid yellow nearly as sharp as a cube's corner. The explanation offered was that the yellow's tongue points up towards lightness as well as out in chroma, so ΔE₀₀ — which shortens chroma at yellow five times and lightness one and a half — shortens it less than a pure chroma spike. Measured from the press's own cells, the tongue leans 23 degrees, less than predicted, and a cone about that axis rescaled by ΔE₀₀ accounts for the yellow's opening to within ten degrees; about a chroma axis it would open twenty-two degrees wider. ΔE₀₀'s own low hue weight at yellow, offered as the alternative, works the other way: it rounds the yellow. And the same account fails at every other corner.
Matching and measuringNine black levels sharpened the press's corners
Three essays measured how far a safety margin pushes the corners of a coated press inward, and found them sharper than anything a smooth solid would have: the solid yellow moving nearly four times the margin, every corner past a cube's. Read by their ink recipes, three of the nine corners are vertices and six are edges, and each has a shape the press model's own derivatives state exactly. Against that shape the edges moved a quarter to two thirds too far. The reason is not the press. It is how the press was built: as three-ink solids at nine levels of black with nothing between them, so that every face black helps to make was scalloped. Walked at thirty-three levels, every corner moves within seven per cent of its own tangent shape, three of the nine are rounder than a cube's corner, and the solid yellow moves 3.2 times the margin, not 3.8.
Matching and measuringThe tolerance unit opens every edge
On a finely sampled press every corner moves under a CIELAB margin as a perfect corner of its own shape would, the shape read off the press model's derivatives. A print buyer states the margin in ΔE₀₀, and the census in that unit had been explained one corner at a time. Carried into ΔE₀₀'s local metric, the same shapes explain all nine at once: each of the six edges' predicted move lies within a tenth of the margin of the census's, and each vertex's within a seventh. ΔE₀₀ opens the edges from 67–141 degrees to 123–157, nearly faces, because a unit along chroma is three to five CIELAB units at these colours. The solid yellow's cone opens only to 59 degrees and stays the one corner sharper than a cube's. Without its chroma term, ΔE₀₀ would leave every corner as sharp as CIELAB does, or sharper.
Matching and measuringThe blue corner has nothing to twist
A safety margin's cost at each corner of a coated press is predicted by the corner's own shape, read off its ink recipe and carried into whatever unit the margin is stated in — for nine corners, none of them blue. At a hue near 275 degrees ΔE₀₀ has a rotation term that couples chroma and hue, and the prediction was that leaving it out would miss the press's blue corner by more than a tenth of the margin. At the blue corner the term is strong: ΔE₀₀'s local matrix correlates a chroma step with a hue step by three quarters. And it changes the prediction by three hundredths. The blue corner and its edges are already blunt in CIELAB — none moves more than 1.3 times a margin — and a corner that is nearly a face has nothing for a shear to twist.
Matching and measuringA display's blue is sharp where the rotation is not
ΔE₀₀'s rotation term shears chroma into hue near a CIELAB hue of 275 degrees, and at a press's blue corner it had nothing to act on because the corner was blunt. The prediction was that a display's blue — an additive primary — would be a sharp corner, and that there the rotation would change how far a safety margin moves it by more than a tenth. The first half holds: sRGB's blue moves 3.35 times a CIELAB margin and BT.2020's 3.17, against the press's 1.25, and insetting the curved gamut directly confirms it to the second decimal. The second half fails, twice. A display's blue sits at 306 degrees, thirty past the rotation's centre, where the term grips a quarter as hard; and ΔE₀₀ blunts the corner to 1.42 by compressing its chroma sevenfold. Along the edge from blue to cyan the hue does pass through 275 and the grip reaches −0.87 — where the edge is nearly a face. Nowhere near either display's blue does the rotation move a prediction by four hundredths.
Matching and measuringThe yellow is sharp where the tolerance unit does not compress
A safety margin moves each corner of a display's gamut inward by a multiple of itself that depends on the corner's shape. In CIELAB, sRGB's blue is its sharpest corner and its yellow among its bluntest; carried into ΔE₀₀, the order turns over, and the yellow becomes the sharpest corner of both sRGB and BT.2020. The prediction was that the yellow keeps its sharpness because its faces run along lightness, where ΔE₀₀'s weighting is largest at the yellow's L* of 97. Taking ΔE₀₀ apart length by length says otherwise. Its lightness weighting changes the yellow's move by nothing. Its chroma compression — the term that opens every other corner — does, on its own, bring every other corner of both displays under 1.35 times a margin, and leaves the yellow at 1.78. Of the yellow's three directions only one runs along chroma; at the other corners two or three do, and a metric that compresses chroma pulls those together and flattens the corner between them.
Matching and measuringAn appearance model flattens the blue by its hue
A safety margin moves a corner of a display's gamut inward by a multiple of itself set by the corner's shape, and the unit the margin is written in decides the shape. In ΔE₀₀ the yellow is the sharpest corner of an sRGB and a BT.2020 display, because its sharpness lies across hue where ΔE₀₀'s chroma compression cannot reach it. CAM16-UCS compresses colourfulness less steeply, and the prediction was that it would leave the blue sharper than the yellow. It leaves the yellow sharpest, at 1.66 times a margin on both displays, and flattens the blue to 1.17 and 1.10 — the bluntest corner of all twelve. Its colourfulness does what the prediction said: on its own it would sharpen the blue past the yellow. Its hue scale undoes that. At a display's blue one degree of CIELAB hue is three and a half degrees of the appearance model's, and a unit that counts hue that finely there spreads the blue's directions apart until the corner is nearly a face.
Matching and measuringA quantiser keeps the blue a spike
A gamut margin moves a display's corners inward by multiples set by the unit it is written in. ΔE₀₀ and CAM16-UCS both blunt an sRGB or BT.2020 display's blue, CAM16-UCS to nearly a face, and the prediction was that ΔEITP — the difference built on ICtCp for high-dynamic-range television — would blunt it too. It does the opposite. With the white at 320 cd/m² the blue is ΔEITP's sharpest corner on both displays, moving 3.12 and 3.24 times a margin, about as far as in CIELAB; at the green, cyan, magenta and yellow the three tolerance units agree within a quarter, and at the blue they span a factor of three. ΔEITP's lengths alone would blunt the blue as ΔE₀₀ does. What keeps it sharp is the perceptual quantiser: ICtCp's chroma rows sum to nought, so under a response that compresses like a logarithm, dimming the blue primary is a step in intensity and nothing else. Replace the quantiser by a linear response and the blue falls to 2.15; by a logarithm, it rises to 3.39. A brighter display sharpens it further.
Matching and measuringA violet primary is no spike to the quantiser
ΔEITP makes a display's blue its sharpest corner, about three times a margin, and the account of why predicted that a shorter-wavelength blue would be sharper still — past four times by 450 nm. Moving a monochromatic blue primary from 490 nm to 440 does the opposite. ΔEITP's blue corner is sharpest at 485 nm, ×4.37, and falls at every step to ×1.23 at 440, where CIELAB's runs the other way, from ×1.92 at 480 to ×11.8, and ΔE₀₀ follows CIELAB. The spike needs the two primaries that can be added to the blue to move it in nearly the same direction. Adding red always raises the blue's L signal by the larger fraction. Adding green does so only while the blue carries enough M signal of its own; a violet primary carries almost none, so adding green raises its M by the larger fraction and the two steps split, from 37 degrees apart to 111. No cone response rescues it — a logarithm blunts the violet further — and a brighter display dulls it while sharpening the longer blues.
Matching and measuringThe green primary decides how sharp the blue is
ΔEITP makes a display's blue its sharpest corner when the blue sits near 485 nm and nearly a face when it sits at 440, and the turn between them is where adding green stops raising the blue's L signal by the larger fraction. The prediction was that the turn follows the green — near 445 nm with a 545 nm green, near 470 with a 515 nm one. It follows the green, by less than half as much at the short end: 461 nm with a 515 nm green, 446 with a 545 nm one, and with a 555 nm green there is no turn left in the range at all. What the prediction did not ask is larger. The green sets how sharp the blue can be: with the blue at 485 nm the corner moves 2.4 times a margin against a 505 nm green and 8.2 times against a 555 nm one, while the sharpest blue stays at 485 nm for every green. The red primary, moved from 615 to 690 nm, leaves the turn where it was to a hundredth of a nanometre. The appearance model follows the green far more gently, under half of ΔEITP's move at every green.
Matching and measuringA broad green sharpens the blue; a broad blue dulls it
ΔEITP makes a display's blue corner sharp or blunt according to its primaries, and the census of single-wavelength primaries found the green deciding how sharp — the 485 nm blue's corner moving 4.37 times a margin against a 530 nm green and 8.19 against a 555 nm one. Real primaries have widths, and the prediction was that a broad green acts as a longer green, raising the spike and moving the turn towards the violet, while a broad blue barely matters. The first half holds: a green forty nanometres wide at 530 nm sharpens the 485 nm corner to 5.05 and moves the turn from 453.7 nm to 451.2, as a single-wavelength green at 535.8 nm would, though its dominant wavelength has moved only to 533. The second half does not: a blue twenty nanometres wide moves the turn by a nanometre but dulls the corner by a tenth, to 3.94. The two widths pull the corner opposite ways, and a display whose green and blue are both broad lands near where its line primaries were. The red, at forty nanometres, still changes nothing that matters.
Matching and measuringA green's long tail sharpens the blue; its short tail does not
A quantum-dot green falls steeply on one side and trails on the other, and the prediction was that a tail on its long side, holding a third of its power, would make ΔEITP's blue corner treat the green as a line past 538 nm, further than a symmetric forty-nanometre green's 535.8, because all its spread is on the L side. It does: 540.7 nm, the 485 nm corner rising from ×4.51 to ×5.70. The control is the larger finding. The same tail on the short side costs the green far more purity — 0.77 against the long tail's 0.95 — and moves its equivalent line by under a nanometre and a half. The corner reads the green's ratio of L to M signal, to within a third of a nanometre for every long tail, and not its purity, its centroid or its dominant wavelength; a short tail lowers that ratio less than its colour suggests and brings S signal that pushes the corner back.
Matching and measuringBrightness and the green sharpen the blue almost independently
ΔEITP's blue corner is sharper the longer a display's green, and sharper the brighter the display. The prediction was that the two compound — that the 555 nm green's lead over the 505 nm one, 3.42 times at 320 cd/m², would pass four by 4,000, because a brighter display narrows every angle and the long green's was narrowest — and that the turn, where adding green starts raising the blue's L by the larger fraction, would not move with the peak at all. Both halves fail. The lead grows by a twentieth, to 3.60 at 4,000 and 3.63 at 10,000; across thirty-five displays the corner is a green factor times a brightness factor to within 4.5%. And the turn moves at every step, two to six nanometres towards the violet from 100 to 10,000 cd/m², crossing the blue at which green raises L and M equally near 1,000. The quantiser weighs a fractional rise in L against one in M by their encoded levels, and brightness evens the scales.
Matching and measuringA tone-mapped blue turns where it lands
In ΔEITP a display's blue corner, and the turn at which adding green to it changes which side of ICtCp's red–green axis it moves the colour to, both shift with the display's peak, because the quantiser reads absolute levels. A high-dynamic-range picture graded on a bright master and shown on a dimmer panel is tone-mapped, its blues delivered below the levels they were graded at. The prediction was that a blue at a tenth of full drive on a 1,000 cd/m² panel turns where a 100 cd/m² panel's full blue does, and that the corner's move differs, because the dimmed blue no longer sits at a vertex. The turn agrees within a hundredth of a nanometre. So does the corner, within half a per cent: the steps both are read from are directions at one absolute signal, whatever drive delivered it. The tone map's whole effect on the blue is where it puts the blue. Through ITU-R BT.2390's curve, a master's bright blues are gathered near a dim display's peak and share one turn there — two nanometres from where the master turned them — while blues under the curve's knee keep their turns exactly.
Matching and measuringA tone curve per channel turns a sky towards cyan
A pure blue tone-mapped from a bright master to a dim display turns, in ΔEITP, wherever its delivered level puts it, and any tone curve that delivers it to the same level gives it the same turn. A picture's blue is not pure. The prediction for a blue mixed with a little green was that a tone curve applied to each channel separately raises the green's share by about half — the blue channel compressed above the curve's knee, the dimmer green left near it — turning the mixture's hue several degrees towards cyan and its turn a nanometre or more from where a curve that scales all three channels together puts it. The turn does move, by 1.6 to 3 nanometres on a 100 cd/m² display and up to 6.5 on a 300. But the share is not raised by half: through BT.2390 to a 100 cd/m² display, a blue graded with a tenth of green arrives with its green at 69 per cent of its blue, nearly seven times as much, and its ICtCp hue turns 23 degrees towards the green. The scaled curve keeps every mixture's hue within three degrees and its turn within half a nanometre of the pure blue's.
Matching and measuringAn appearance model sees the per-channel sky turn twice as far
BT.2390's tone curve, applied to each channel of a 1,000 cd/m² master shown on a 100 cd/m² display, raises a sky-blue's green share from a tenth to 69 per cent of its blue and turns its ICtCp hue 23°, where the same curve applied to the largest channel with all three scaled keeps the hue within 3°. ICtCp's hue is not an appearance, and the prediction was that CIECAM16, read under the display's own white, still shows the per-channel turn as more than twenty hue-quadrature units and more than ten ΔEITP, the scaled curve under three of each. The appearance model sees it as fifty-two units, more than half the way from unique blue to unique green, and its lightness more than doubles. The scaled curve keeps hue and lightness to a quarter of a unit. And ΔEITP between master and display ranks the two curves backwards: in absolute light the per-channel sky is the nearer one.
Matching and measuringA curve on intensity cannot see a blue's brightness
ITU-R BT.2390's tone curve applied to each channel of a bright master turns a tone-mapped sky's appearance fifty-two hue-quadrature units towards green on a 100 cd/m² display; applied to the largest channel with all three scaled, it keeps hue and lightness to a quarter of a unit. BT.2390 also describes applying the curve to ICtCp's intensity and scaling its chroma, which keeps ICtCp's hue by construction, and the prediction was that it keeps the appearance's hue within three units and its lightness within two. It keeps the hue, within 2.3 units. It cannot keep anything on the display: a saturated blue's intensity is the PQ level of 79 cd/m², under the 300 cd/m² display's knee, so the curve barely touches it and every sky asks for two to seven times the blue the display has. Clipped channel by channel, the sky turns as far as the per-channel curve turned it; scaled back into the gamut, it lands where the scaled curve put it. The step back into the gamut decides the appearance, not the curve.
Matching and measuringLowering only the chroma turns the sky white and its hue with it
A tone curve applied to ICtCp's intensity keeps a high-dynamic-range sky's hue, but a saturated blue's intensity lies under the curve's knee, so the colour it asks for lies outside every display's gamut. The prediction was that bringing it back by lowering its chroma alone — intensity and ICtCp hue held — keeps the CIECAM16 hue within three units, lifts the lightness by ten and halves the chroma: a paler blue of the right hue. The ICtCp hue and intensity are kept to a hundredth. Everything else fails. The chroma must fall to a fifth or less on a 100 cd/m² display, the sky rises from a lightness of 22 to 76 and higher, and its hue quadrature moves eight to seventeen units toward green — a pure blue's by 17. Holding ICtCp's hue while lowering chroma does not hold the hue a viewer sees, and the intensity the curve chose was never a blue's.
Matching and measuringThe sky a dim display can show best is the master's own
A tone curve applied to ICtCp's intensity maps a saturated high-dynamic-range sky to a colour no display can show, and bringing it back by lowering only its ICtCp chroma turns it pale and toward green. The prediction was that a return along CIECAM16's own hue line, at the lightness the curve chose, holds the hue by construction, needs a deeper chroma cut, and still lies at least twice as far from the master as simply scaling the drives. It holds the hue to a hundredth, keeps more chroma than ICtCp's return rather than less, and lies two and a half to four times as far as scaling — because holding the true hue removes only one or two of seventeen units of difference. The rest is the lightness the curve held. And the nearest a dimmer display can come to the master's appearance turns out to be the master's drives, shown unmapped.