How much of a whiteness figure is the sheet, and how much is the lamp
Drawn at its defaults, in the band below 380 nanometres. It takes 8 options, and the essays below show what each placement asks of it.
Called by 33 essays
the blast radius of changing it
Two sheets that match until the window
Ordinary metamerism is two reflectances that agree under one light and not another, and it can always be undone by putting the first light back. A dyed sheet and a brightened one have the same reflectance everywhere an eye can see, agree exactly under any lamp with no ultraviolet, and separate by ten units under daylight — and no change of light puts them back together.
What a scene doesThe window is part of the light
A viewing condition here has always been a spectrum and a geometry. For anything fluorescent it needs a third thing — the transmittance of whatever the daylight came through — because ordinary window glass, a laminated windscreen and a museum filter remove three quite different parts of the band a brightener eats, and the sheet is a different colour behind each.
What it takes to deliver itA proof cannot glow
A proof is a different sheet of paper pretending to be the production one, and the pretence works by adding ink until the two agree. It cannot work for a brightened stock, because the direction the proof has to travel is towards more blue at the same lightness and every ink a proofer owns moves it towards less light instead.
Difference and uniformityWhiteness is mostly the lamp
The CIE whiteness formula ranks white samples the way people do, which is what it was built for and is not in question. What is in question is what it is a measurement of — take the ultraviolet out of the instrument and 82 per cent of the scale collapses, because the part that separates a premium sheet from an ordinary one was contributed by the lamp.
Where the model breaksA white that is not a reflectance
The object-colour solid is the hardest boundary in colorimetry — the set of tristimulus values any reflecting surface can produce, with no assumption about pigments in it at all. A coated press stock under a measurement standard's own lamp sits 1.5 per cent outside it, and a heavily brightened one 4.0, and with the ultraviolet removed both come back inside.
Where the model breaksThe brightener is being used up
The molecule that absorbs an ultraviolet photon occasionally does something other than re-emit it, and what it does is break. So a sheet's whiteness has a half-life, the fall is steepest at the start, and a specification quoting a whiteness figure without a date is quoting a property of a sheet that no longer exists.
What the brain doesA brighter white still looks white
Colorimetry says a brightened sheet is nine units of b* from neutral, which sounds like a visible blue. An appearance model with the observer adapted to the room says it carries eleven units of chroma at a hue of 295 degrees — genuinely blue-violet — and that the number falls by nearly half between a bright room and a dark one. What it cannot say is why anybody calls the result white.
Where the model breaksThe limits assume a pigment that switches instantly
The hardest boundary in colorimetry is reached by reflectances that jump between nought and one at a wavelength, and no material does that. Constrain the jump to take twenty nanometres — a sharp dye — and the median direction of the object-colour solid loses under half a per cent of its reach. Constrain it to eighty, an ordinary pigment, and the median loses five per cent, the tenth percentile nearly a quarter, and seven directions in ten lose more than one. The cost is in a corner only for chemistry sharper than paint.
Where the model breaksThree lines spare a slow pigment
A pigment that cannot switch faster than forty nanometres loses more than a per cent of its reach in 183 of the object-colour solid's 305 directions under daylight. Under an LED whose light sits in three narrow lines, it loses that much in 62. Between the lines almost nothing is measured, so a slow reflectance can do its changing there — until its transitions are as wide as the lines are far apart, at which point the lamp stops helping and the count jumps to daylight's.
Where the model breaksA limit written in energy charges the reds
A slope limit on reflectance is usually written in nanometres and applied the same way across the spectrum. An absorption band's width is closer to a fixed spread of photon energy, which is nearly twice as many nanometres at 700 as at 500. Written that way, a limit that is forty nanometres at 550 is kinder to the object-colour solid overall — 489 of 913 directions lose a per cent rather than 544 — and it charges the reds more. Which directions pay is decided by one thing: whether their optimal edges fall above or below the reference wavelength.
Where the model breaksA fourth emitter spends the gap it fills
A three-emitter LED lets a pigment that takes forty nanometres to switch reach most of its ideal solid, because the lamp is dark where the pigment is slow. Adding a fourth emitter to render better takes that darkness back — but only if it is put in the middle of a gap. At 490 nanometres it costs 172 of the solid's 312 directions against the three-emitter lamp's 62, and renders two points worse. At 540 it costs three directions and renders two and a half points better.
Where the model breaksThe gap has to be dark, not the line narrow
A lamp whose light sits in three narrow emitters lets a blunt pigment reach most of its ideal solid, and the reason was given as the spacing of the lines. Broadening those emitters without moving them says otherwise. At 1.3 times their nominal width the lamp still looks like a line spectrum, its closest spacing has not changed at all, and half the rescue is gone — because the darkest point of the narrow gap has risen from one per cent of the lamp's peak to seven.
Where the model breaksA sharp edge is bought with depth
A slope limit on reflectance was introduced as the weakest honest statement of a pigment's bluntness, with a band-shape limit named as the stronger version to be written later. Written, it is not stronger. Three absorption bands none narrower than forty nanometres reach further than a forty-nanometre slope limit in 94 of 154 directions of the object-colour solid, because a band's width and the width of the reflectance edge it draws are different quantities — and what converts one into the other is how much colorant is in the film.
Where the model breaksA lopsided band does not break the trade
A fourth emitter added to a three-emitter LED renders colours better and costs a slow pigment its reach, and the position that renders best and the position that costs least were thirty-five nanometres apart. The obvious suspect was the shape: every emitter searched was a symmetric bump, and a band with its skirt on one side might fill a gap without splitting it. Freed to be lopsided, it saves between one and seven of the solid's three hundred directions. No band renders like the amber emitter and costs like the green one, the lopsided bands that help lean the other way from the proposal, and what the fourth band renders was never the lamp's white.
Where the model breaksThe pigment decides the trade, not the band
A four-emitter lamp that renders well costs a slow pigment part of its reach, and reshaping the fourth band barely changes that. Changing the pigment changes it a great deal. Modelled as three absorption bands none narrower than forty nanometres, rather than as a forty-nanometre slope limit, a slow pigment loses a third fewer of the solid's directions under the best-rendering lamp, and the price of going from the three-emitter lamp to a fidelity of 88 halves. The lopsided band that helped a slope-limited pigment does nothing at all for this one. And at 590 nanometres a fourth band renders at 86 almost for free.
Where the model breaksWritten in energy, the bands spare the green
A slow pigment modelled as absorption bands pays half what a slope limit pays for a four-emitter lamp's rendering, and a fourth band at 590 nanometres costs it almost nothing. That result assumed every band is at least forty nanometres wide, and a real absorption band has a width in energy, not in nanometres. Written that way it is narrower in the blue and wider in the red, and the fear was that the red would take back the amber. It does not. The band limit written in energy loses fewer directions under every lamp, the fourth band at 590 still costs six, and the price of rendering at 88 falls from ten directions to six — because the directions it wins back are green, not amber.
Where the model breaksThe lamp outweighs the pigment model
Three models of what a real colorant can do — a slope limit, absorption bands forty nanometres wide, and bands whose width is fixed in energy — were ranked under lamps of narrow emitters, slope dearest and energy cheapest. Under daylight, tungsten and a white LED the ranking holds, every time. What changes is everything else: each model loses two and a half to three and a half times as many directions of the object-colour solid under a broadband lamp as under three narrow emitters, and the difference between the models is smaller than the difference between the lamps. Under tungsten, whose power rises smoothly to the red, the three models are nearly one.
Where the model breaksA tube spares a pigment through its phosphors
Three models of a real pigment lose two and a half to three and a half times as many directions of the object-colour solid under daylight as under three narrow emitters. A fluorescent tube is both kinds of lamp — narrow mercury lines on phosphor bands — and the prediction was that its bands would light the gaps between its lines and put it two thirds of the way to daylight. A triphosphor tube sits with the emitters instead: 26 directions lost to forty-nanometre bands, against the emitters' 23 and daylight's 73. The credit is its phosphors'. Its coating alone, lines taken out, loses fewer still; its mercury lines cost directions whose edges sit in the gaps between the phosphors, and doubled they cost more. A halophosphate tube, the same lines on two broad bands, costs what daylight costs at the same rendering index.
Where the model breaksA mercury lamp's few losses are deep
Every census of what a slow pigment can reach has counted the directions of the object-colour solid it misses by more than one per cent, and by that count a clear mercury lamp — four visible lines and nothing else — spares a pigment as well as three narrow emitters do. Read for depth, it is the one lamp of nine whose losses do not fall away: half of what a slope-limited pigment loses under it, it loses by more than five per cent, and its mean shortfall is half as large again as under the emitters or a triphosphor tube. Every one of those losses is the same kind of colour: one that reflects the mercury's green line at 546 nm and absorbs its yellow line at 578, or the reverse, 32 nm apart. The dark-share rule that ordered the counts orders the depths less well.
Where the model breaksA pair of lines asks for a cliff, not a gap
Under a clear mercury lamp, every direction of colour a slow pigment loses by more than five per cent asks it to reflect one of the lamp's green and yellow lines, 32 nanometres apart, and absorb the other. The prediction was that a pigment of two absorption bands with a narrow gap between them — a peak no single transition can make — would recover those deep losses. No direction asks for a peak. The lamp's four lines leave only one transition within a hundred nanometres of another, so what a splitting direction needs is a cliff: one flank falling from reflecting to absorbing in the twenty-five nanometres between the green line's last strong sample and the yellow's first. One band at the census's depth takes 27.8 to fall that far; two stacked at one centre take 24.9. Searched from 680 starts, the census's own band model does exactly that — stacks its bands on one side of the pair — and reaches further than the census found in seventeen directions of twenty-five. What stays deep spends a band on the blue.
Where the model breaksA harder search pulls the band pigments away from the slope limit
Every count in the pigment-limit censuses — how many directions of the object-colour solid a slow pigment cannot reach within one per cent of the ideal — compares a slope limit solved exactly with two band models searched from a few structured starts. Under the mercury lamp a search from 680 starts had already found the band model reaching further in seventeen of twenty-five directions. Searched from 594 starts under all nine lamps, both band models reach further in between three fifths and nineteen twentieths of the directions they lost, and their counts fall by a sixth: 395 to 335 for bands in nanometres, 370 to 311 for bands in energy, while the slope limit stays at 463. The rankings the censuses reported hold where they were stated. What moves is everything measured against the slope limit: its lead over the band models grows from a sixth to more than a third, the coating's odd ranking — bands losing more than the slope limit — disappears, the triphosphor tube passes the three emitters for bands in nanometres, and under the mercury lamp the band models' deep losses halve.
Where the model breaksThe slope limit was exact all along
Every count of what a slow pigment cannot reach compares a slope limit, solved exactly on 161 levels of reflectance, with two band models found by searching. Searched harder, the band models lost a sixth of their losses, and the open question was whether the slope limit was being flattered by its own grid — whether 321 or 641 levels would lower its counts too. The prediction was a fall of under a twentieth. There is no fall at all: on every finer grid, under all nine lamps, every direction reaches exactly what it reached, and 463 directions are lost as before. The reason is the shape of the answer. The best reflectance that may change by at most an eighth per five-nanometre band is a staircase whose every step is a whole eighth, because a weighted sum is maximised at a corner of the allowed set and every corner is built from full steps off nought or one. A grid of only the nine eighths gives every answer to the last digit. The census's count is therefore not an estimate on a grid but an exact statement about every pigment that slow, and the slope limit's 1.38-fold lead over the searched band model is a floor that further search can only raise.
Where the model breaksA slow pigment splits mercury's lines only if its swing fits between them
Under a clear mercury lamp a pigment whose reflectance may swing from nought to one over no less than forty nanometres loses 21 of the census's 148 directions, and every one of them asks it to reflect one of the lamp's green and yellow lines and absorb the other. The census samples the spectrum every five nanometres, which smears each six-nanometre line across a band, and the prediction was that a one-nanometre grid would let the pigment's cliff fall between the lines and cut the count by a third. It cuts it by nothing: 21 on either grid. Narrowing the lines to one and a half nanometres cuts it only to 17. What decides the losses is the lines' spacing, 31.5 nanometres, against the pigment's swing. With narrow lines a pigment whose swing is 30 nanometres loses no direction at all, and one whose swing is 34 loses fourteen; the step sits at the gap. The mercury lamp's cost to a slow pigment belongs to the lamp, not to how the census samples it.
Where the model breaksA band pigment must be narrower than the gap it splits
Under a clear mercury lamp a pigment built from absorption bands no narrower than forty nanometres falls short in fifteen of the twenty-five directions that ask it to reflect the green line and absorb the yellow, or the reverse — the count an earlier search left short however deep it cut its cliff. The slope-limited pigment's losses turned out to be the lines' 31.5 nm spacing against its swing, and the prediction was that the band pigment's are the same arithmetic, falling to nought near a band thirty nanometres wide. Searched on a one-nanometre grid with the lines narrowed, the count falls at every narrower band — fifteen at forty, eleven at thirty-five, nine at thirty — and reaches nought at twenty-five, not thirty. Every loss already splits the pair and falls short on both lines at once: a Gaussian band deep enough to absorb one line keeps absorbing a little of the other. One band of depth twelve, placed as well as it can be, errs by 3.2 per cent at forty nanometres, 0.8 at thirty and 0.2 at twenty-five; doubling its depth buys less than narrowing it by five nanometres.
Where the model breaksA steep side splits mercury's lines at forty nanometres
Under a clear mercury lamp a pigment built from Gaussian absorption bands no narrower than forty nanometres falls short in fifteen of the twenty-five directions that ask it to reflect the green line and absorb the yellow, or the reverse, because a band's tail reaches the line it should pass. Real dye bands are often lopsided, and the prediction was that a band whose one side is half the other's, the steep side free to face either way, loses at forty nanometres about as many directions as a symmetric band thirty wide — nine — and helps only the directions that pass the green. It loses one. At thirty-five and thirty it loses none. In every one of the twenty-five fits the absorbing band turns its steep side to the line it must pass, and both kinds of direction gain: none of fourteen passing the green is lost, one of eleven passing the yellow. A single band forty nanometres wide with a steep side splits the two lines within 0.37 per cent; a symmetric band must narrow to about twenty-seven to do as well.
Where the model breaksA band must be nearly two to one before its steep side pays
Under a clear mercury lamp, a pigment of absorption bands forty nanometres wide loses fifteen or sixteen of the twenty-five directions that ask it to reflect the green line and absorb the yellow, or the reverse, and the same bands with one side a third of the width and the other two thirds lose one. The prediction for milder skews was that the losses fall in step with a single band's error — to about eight at sides of 0.55 and 0.45, three at 0.6 and 0.4 — so that a three-to-two skew already halves them. It does not. The census loses thirteen at 0.55, ten at 0.6, five at 0.65 and one at two to one: three directions recovered per twentieth of skew at first, twelve at the last. The losses track one band's error against the one-per-cent line the census counts by, and a single band crosses that line only near a skew of 0.62. A dye's modest natural asymmetry buys a few directions; the steep side pays only when it is close to half the other.
Where the model breaksA band is only as wide as its steep side
Under a clear mercury lamp, a pigment of absorption bands forty nanometres wide must be skewed nearly two to one before it can split the green line from the yellow, and the prediction for bands five nanometres narrower was that a single band crosses one per cent of error near a skew of 0.57 and the census's losses fall to five or fewer by 0.6. The losses do fall to four by 0.6; the single band crosses one per cent at 0.555. But the forty-nanometre rule that read the losses off that one-per-cent line breaks at once, and what replaces it is simpler: a thirty-five-nanometre band at 0.6 and a forty-nanometre band at 0.65 have the same steep side, fourteen nanometres, and lose the same four directions by the same shortfalls to a hundredth of a point. Three widths and fourteen pigments fall on one staircase in the steep side alone. Searching every loss again from the milder skews' answers finds one direction the census missed, at both widths, and corrects the forty-nanometre counts to nine and four.
Where the model breaksAt one half-width a flank can lose nothing or nearly everything
Under a clear mercury lamp, a pigment of Gaussian absorption bands splits the green line from the yellow according to its steep side's half-width alone, and a Gaussian flank is fixed by its half-width — so the census could not say whether it measures the half-width or the absorbance left in the flank's foot at the line it should spare. The prediction was that the foot decides: at a half-width of fourteen nanometres, a Lorentzian steep side loses most of the twenty-five splitting directions and a sharper-footed one none. It does. A power-four Gaussian loses none, the Gaussian four, a squared hyperbolic secant nineteen and a Lorentzian twenty-two, in the order of their single bands' errors. But a single band's error is not the whole account: three profiles drawn at the half-widths that give a single band the same error — 7.73, fourteen and 39.1 nanometres — lose two, four and seven directions, and the widest of them loses directions the others keep, because its shoulder starts absorbing nearer the green.
Where the model breaksA hundredth of Lorentzian undoes a Gaussian flank
Under a clear mercury lamp, a band pigment whose steep side is a Gaussian fourteen nanometres wide at half depth loses four of the twenty-five directions that split the green line from the yellow, and the same side drawn as a Lorentzian loses twenty-two. A real absorption band is usually a Voigt profile, a Gaussian core with a Lorentzian share in its wings, and the prediction was that a twentieth of Lorentzian doubles the Gaussian's losses and a fifth reaches nineteen. The direction is right and the scale is not. A hundredth of Lorentzian takes the pigment from four lost directions to eleven; a fiftieth to fourteen; a twentieth to eighteen; a fifth to twenty. The best-placed band leaves the passed line more than three half-widths from its centre, out in the wing, and there a wing one per cent Lorentzian carries twice the absorbance of the whole Gaussian. The count saturates near twenty while the worst direction's shortfall keeps growing, from 2.8 per cent at a hundredth to 51 with a full Lorentzian.
Where the model breaksA narrower flank moves its wing in with it
Under a clear mercury lamp, a band pigment whose steep side is a Gaussian fourteen nanometres wide loses four of the twenty-five directions that split the green line from the yellow, and with a twentieth of Lorentzian in that side it loses eighteen, because the wing three half-widths out out-absorbs the whole Gaussian there. A Lorentzian wing falls as the square of the distance over its half-width, and the prediction was that narrowing the side to seven nanometres brings the twentieth-Lorentzian pigment back to four losses and to five nanometres to none. It loses thirteen at ten nanometres, twelve at seven and seven at five, while the Gaussian loses nothing at all three. The wing still decides: the narrower band does not stay where the wider one sat but moves fourteen nanometres in towards the line it must pass, so its wing there falls fourfold rather than eightfold.
Where the model breaksA five-nanometre flank carries a fiftieth of Lorentzian
A band pigment splitting mercury's green and yellow lines with a steep side five nanometres wide loses none of the twenty-five splitting directions as a Gaussian and seven with a twentieth of Lorentzian in its flank, because the band slides in towards the passed line and carries its wing there. The prediction was that at five nanometres the count follows the single band's error, which grows in proportion to the share: about two lost at a fiftieth and none at a hundredth. A hundredth loses none, as predicted. The first search lost one direction at a fiftieth — and searched again from the best pigments found at the neighbouring shares, that direction reaches within two thousandths of the ideal: a fiftieth loses none either. The same second search recovers two of the twentieth's seven, leaving five. A sharp enough flank tolerates a fiftieth of Lorentzian where a fourteen-nanometre one lost fourteen directions to it.
Where the model breaksEach direction falls short by one band's ratio
A band pigment asked to reflect mercury's green line and absorb its yellow, with a twentieth of Lorentzian in its steep side, loses eighteen of twenty-five splitting directions at a steep side fourteen nanometres wide, thirteen at ten, twelve at seven and five at five. A second search had lowered the five-nanometre count, and the prediction was that searching the seven- and ten-nanometre pigments again lowers each by one or two, leaving a count nearly linear in the half-width. Searched again, both lose exactly what they lost — no direction gains six tenths of a point. The uneven fall is real, and the reason is plainer than any search: every direction's shortfall falls with the half-width by the same factor as a single band's error, so the count is a fixed ranking of constants, one a direction, read against a line that moves.
Where the model breaksThe ranking reads six nanometres to the direction
Every direction a band pigment loses under mercury's lines falls short, as its steep side narrows, by the same factor as a single band's error — so each direction carries a constant, and the count at any half-width can be read off one band with no search at all. Read that way, a twentieth of Lorentzian loses nine directions at a six-nanometre steep side, three at four and a half and none at four. Searched, six nanometres loses nine: the same nine, every direction within 6.2 per cent of where the constants put it. Four loses none. Four and a half loses one, not three — the two the ranking added sit 0.005 and 0.011 of a point under the one-per-cent line. And at the narrowest widths the gentle directions begin to fall short by more than the ranking says, by up to 29 per cent, which is where the single band stops being the whole story.