Generator

The protan confusion point, at the scale the population occupies

A close view of one confusion point, 0.187 units of chromaticity across — a region far too small to see on the diagram itself. 200 small markers show where a population of eyes puts the protan point; a larger marker shows the quoted value this site has used since its first commit, and a ring shows the cloud's root-mean-square radius of 2.50e-2. The cloud's centre sits 0.0134 from the quoted point, which is inside its own spread. The nearest published transform commits to a protan point 2.2 standard deviations away, which is off this picture entirely.
The protan confusion point, at the scale the population occupies. A close view of one confusion point, 0.187 units of chromaticity across — a region far too small to see on the diagram itself. 200 small markers show where a population of eyes puts the protan point; a larger marker shows the quoted value this site has used since its first commit, and a ring shows the cloud's root-mean-square radius of 2.50e-2. The cloud's centre sits 0.0134 from the quoted point, which is inside its own spread. The nearest published transform commits to a protan point 2.2 standard deviations away, which is off this picture entirely.

Drawn at its defaults, in the three points, given a population. It reads 3 options and no others: show, kind, n.

Called by 5 essays

the blast radius of changing it

What the eye does

A template cannot place a point

This collection's model of an eye is good to a few tenths of a per cent at predicting what a cone catches, which is far more than enough to place a spectrum. Asked where that eye's confusion points are, it puts the protanope's at (0.99, 0.20) against a measured (0.75, 0.25) and the deuteranope's anywhere from (1.1, −0.5) to (−18, 11) depending on which stimuli the fit was made over.

Where the model breaks

The price is also the person

The receptor construction costs seventy per cent above the unconstrained floor, which is a number usually quoted as a property of the construction. Propagated across a population of eyes it runs from a quarter above the floor to a hundred and thirty per cent above it, and the population's own spread is wider than the entire gap between the published transforms the seventy per cent was being compared against.

Matching and measuring

Two points out of three

Every published adaptation transform implies three dichromat confusion points, whether or not it was fitted to any. Measured in the population's own standard deviations they are two to fourteen out on the protanope's point and four to twelve on the deuteranope's — and between half a standard deviation and two and a half on the tritanope's, which is inside the population. The claim that these matrices are not cone responses is safe. The evidence for it is two points.

What the brain does

A trade between matrices, not people

Across the space of possible bases, adapting well and discriminating well pull in opposite directions — the two optima sit at the ends of an empty diagonal. Across a population of actual observers the same two costs move weakly together, at a correlation of +0.29. The trade-off is a property of the set of matrices somebody could choose, not of the eyes anybody has. One measurement inside the population does trade, and it is the macular pigment.

Where the model breaks

What the audit still cannot reach

Two rounds have now swept every declared width in this collection and one of its structural choices. Three structural choices remain, none of them has a multiplier to sweep, and the reason each resists is different — which makes the list a description of where this kind of audit ends rather than a queue of work.

All 155 generators · what each essay asks for instead